Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
3.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 60(4): 103174, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1251570

ABSTRACT

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is associated with high titers of immunoglobulin G class antibodies directed against the cationic platelet chemokine platelet factor 4 (PF4). These antibodies activate platelets via FcγIIa receptors. VITT closely resembles heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Inflammation and tissue trauma substantially increase the risk for forming pathogenic PF4 antibodies. We therefore propose the use of therapeutic plasma exchange as rescue therapy in VITT to deplete antibodies plus factors promoting inflammation such as excess cytokines in the circulation as well as extracellular vesicles derived from activated platelets.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Plasma Exchange , Platelet Factor 4/immunology , Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic/therapy , Salvage Therapy , Albumins , Antibody Specificity , Anticoagulants , Autoantibodies/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/pharmacology , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Citrates , Contraindications, Procedure , Cytokines/blood , Extracellular Vesicles , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunosuppression Therapy , Inflammation , Plasma Exchange/adverse effects , Plasma Exchange/methods , Platelet Activation , Platelet Transfusion/adverse effects , Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic/etiology , Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic/immunology , Registries , Thrombocytopenia/etiology , Thrombosis/etiology
6.
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 71(6): 386-392, 2020.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1002943

ABSTRACT

The current COVID-19 pandemic has rendered up to 15% of patients under mechanical ventilation. Because the subsequent tracheotomy is a frequent procedure, the three societies mostly involved (SEMICYUC, SEDAR and SEORL-CCC) have setup a consensus paper that offers an overview about indications and contraindications of tracheotomy, be it by puncture or open, clarifying its respective advantages and enumerating the ideal conditions under which they should be performed, as well as the necessary steps. Regular and emergency situations are displayed together with the postoperative measures.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Consensus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Societies, Medical , Tracheostomy/standards , Anesthesiology , Bronchoscopy/adverse effects , Bronchoscopy/standards , COVID-19 , Contraindications, Procedure , Coronary Care Units , Elective Surgical Procedures/standards , Emergencies , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Otolaryngology , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures , Pandemics , Postoperative Care/methods , Postoperative Care/standards , Respiration, Artificial/standards , Resuscitation , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain , Time Factors , Tracheostomy/adverse effects , Tracheostomy/methods
7.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) ; 44(8): 493-499, 2020 Nov.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1002891

ABSTRACT

The current COVID-19 pandemic has rendered up to 15% of patients under mechanical ventilation. Because the subsequent tracheotomy is a frequent procedure, the three societies mostly involved (SEMICYUC, SEDAR and SEORL-CCC) have setup a consensus paper that offers an overview about indications and contraindications of tracheotomy, be it by puncture or open, clarifying its respective advantages and enumerating the ideal conditions under which they should be performed, as well as the necessary steps. Regular and emergency situations are displayed together with the postoperative measures.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Consensus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Societies, Medical , Tracheostomy/standards , Anesthesiology , Bronchoscopy/adverse effects , Bronchoscopy/standards , COVID-19 , Contraindications, Procedure , Coronary Care Units , Elective Surgical Procedures/standards , Emergencies , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Otolaryngology , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures , Pandemics , Postoperative Care/methods , Postoperative Care/standards , Respiration, Artificial/standards , Resuscitation , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain/epidemiology , Time Factors , Tracheostomy/adverse effects , Tracheostomy/methods
8.
BMJ Open Qual ; 9(3)2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-807785

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant morbidity and mortality globally. As health systems grapple with caring for patients affected with COVID-19, cardiovascular procedures that are deemed 'elective' have been postponed. Guidelines concerning which cardiac procedures should be performed during the pandemic vary by specialty and geography in the USA. We propose a clinical heuristic to guide individual physicians and governing bodies in their decision making regarding which cardiac procedures should be performed during the COVID-19 pandemic using the behavioural economics concept of heuristics and ecological rationality.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures/psychology , Clinical Decision-Making/methods , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Economics, Behavioral , Elective Surgical Procedures/psychology , Heuristics , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Contraindications, Procedure , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
9.
Ann Ital Chir ; 91: 273-276, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-739593

ABSTRACT

CASE REPORT: A 64-year-old woman presented to our emergency department during the outbreak of the covid-19 emergency in Italy with syncope, anosmia, mild dyspnoea and atypical chest and dorsal pain. A chest CT scan showed an acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) and bilateral lung involvement with ground-glass opacity, compatible with interstitial pneumonia. Nasopharyngeal swabs resulted positive for SARS-CoV-2. For the persistence of chest pain, despite the analgesic therapy, we decided to treat her with a TEVAR. Patient's chest and back pain resolved during the first few days after the procedure. No surgical or respiratory complications occurred and the patient was discharged 14 days after surgery. DISCUSSION: By performing the operation under local anesthesia, it was possible to limit both the staff inside the operatory room and droplet/aerosol release. Since we had to perform the operation in a hemodynamics room, thanks to the limited extension of the endoprosthesis and the good caliber of the right vertebral artery we were able to reduce the risk of spinal cord ischemia despite the lack of a revascularization of the left subclavian artery. CONCLUSIONS: A minimally invasive total endovascular approach allows, through local anesthesia and percutaneous access, to avoid surgical cut down and orotracheal intubation. This, combined with a defined management protocol for infected patients, seems to be a reasonable way to perform endovascular aortic procedures in urgent setting, even in a SARSCoV- 2 positive patient. KEY WORDS: COVID-19, Dissection, TEVAR.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Infection Control/methods , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Anesthesia, Local , Aortic Dissection/complications , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/complications , COVID-19 , Contraindications, Procedure , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Darunavir/therapeutic use , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Drug Therapy, Combination , Enoxaparin/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Nasopharynx/virology , Operating Rooms , Patient Isolation , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2 , Spinal Cord Ischemia/prevention & control , Vertebral Artery/surgery
10.
J Neurol Sci ; 417: 117087, 2020 10 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-696852

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic has led to challenges in provision of care, clinical assessment and communication with families. The unique considerations associated with evaluation of catastrophic brain injury and death by neurologic criteria in patients with Covid-19 infection have not been examined. METHODS: We describe the evaluation of six patients hospitalized at a health network in New York City in April 2020 who had Covid-19, were comatose and had absent brainstem reflexes. RESULTS: Four males and two females with a median age of 58.5 (IQR 47-68) were evaluated for catastrophic brain injury due to stroke and/or global anoxic injury at a median of 14 days (IQR 13-18) after admission for acute respiratory failure due to Covid-19. All patients had hypotension requiring vasopressors and had been treated with sedative/narcotic drips for ventilator dyssynchrony. Among these patients, 5 had received paralytics. Apnea testing was performed for 1 patient due to the decision to withdraw treatment (n = 2), concern for inability to tolerate testing (n = 2) and observation of spontaneous respirations (n = 1). The apnea test was aborted due to hypoxia and hypotension. After ancillary testing, death was declared in three patients based on neurologic criteria and in three patients based on cardiopulmonary criteria (after withdrawal of support (n = 2) or cardiopulmonary arrest (n = 1)). A family member was able to visit 5/6 patients prior to cardiopulmonary arrest/discontinuation of organ support. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to evaluate patients with catastrophic brain injury and declare brain death despite the Covid-19 pandemic, but this requires unique considerations.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Brain Death/diagnosis , Brain Injuries/etiology , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Aged , Apnea/etiology , COVID-19 , Cerebral Hemorrhage/etiology , Contraindications, Procedure , Electroencephalography , Female , Heart Arrest/etiology , Humans , Hypoxia, Brain/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Neuroimaging , Neurologic Examination , Professional-Family Relations , SARS-CoV-2 , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Truth Disclosure
13.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) ; 44(9): 525-533, 2020 Dec.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-644103

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and respiratory characteristics of a cohort of 43 patients with COVID-19 after an evolutive period of 28 days. DESIGN: A prospective, single-center observational study was carried out. SETTING: Intensive care. PATIENTS: Patients admitted due to COVID-19 and respiratory failure. INTERVENTIONS: None. VARIABLES: Automatic recording was made of demographic variables, severity parameters, laboratory data, assisted ventilation (HFO: high-flow oxygen therapy and IMV: invasive mechanical ventilation), oxygenation (PaO2, PaO2/FiO2) and complications. The patients were divided into three groups: survivors (G1), deceased (G2) and patients remaining under admission (G3). The chi-squared test or Fisher exact test (categorical variables) was used, along with the Mann-Whitney U-test or Wilcoxon test for analyzing the differences between medians. Statistical significance was considered for p<0.05. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were included (G1=28 [65.1%]; G2=10 [23.3%] and G3=5 [11.6%]), with a mean age of 65 years (range: 52-72), 62% males, APACHE II 18 (15-24), SOFA 6 (4-7). Arterial hypertension (30.2%) and obesity (25.6%) were the most frequent comorbidities. High-flow oxygen therapy was used in 62.7% of the patients, with failure in 85%. In turn, 95% of the patients required IMV and 85% received ventilation in prone decubitus. In the general population, initial PaO2/FiO2 improved after 7 days (165 [125-210] vs.194 [153-285]; p=0.02), in the same way as in G1 (164 [125-197] vs. 207 [160-294]; p=0.07), but not in G2 (163 [95-197] vs. 135 [85-177]). No bacterial coinfection was observed. The incidence of IMV-associated pneumonia was high (13 episodes/1000 days of IMV). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COVID-19 require early IMV, a high frequency of ventilation in prone decubitus, and have a high incidence of failed HFO. The lack of improvement of PaO2/FiO2 at 7 days could be a prognostic marker. .


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Age Distribution , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/complications , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Chi-Square Distribution , Contraindications, Procedure , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Multimorbidity , Noninvasive Ventilation/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Spain/epidemiology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Tertiary Care Centers , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
14.
J Clin Apher ; 35(4): 378-381, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-633842

ABSTRACT

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to claim lives across the globe, insufficient data exists regarding the optimal treatment. It is well known that patients 55 years of age or older and patients with certain chronic diseases are at higher risk of severe illness, including acute respiratory distress syndrome and death. A potentially fatal pulmonary complication of sickle cell disease, acute chest syndrome, can be precipitated by acute infections, including respiratory viruses. We report the case of a patient with sickle cell disease (HbSC) who developed COVID-19 pneumonia and acute chest syndrome who was treated with emergent red blood cell exchange in order to avoid endotracheal intubation.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Erythrocyte Transfusion/methods , Intubation, Intratracheal , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Acute Chest Syndrome/etiology , Acute Chest Syndrome/therapy , Adult , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Combined Modality Therapy , Contraindications, Procedure , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Male , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed) ; 67(9): 504-510, 2020 Nov.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-592287

ABSTRACT

The current COVID-19 pandemic has rendered up to 15% of patients under mechanical ventilation. Because the subsequent tracheotomy is a frequent procedure, the three societies mostly involved (SEMICYUC, SEDAR and SEORL-CCC) have setup a consensus paper that offers an overview about indications and contraindications of tracheotomy, be it by puncture or open, clarifying its respective advantages and enumerating the ideal conditions under which they should be performed, as well as the necessary steps. Regular and emergency situations are displayed together with the postoperative measures.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Consensus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Societies, Medical , Tracheostomy/standards , Anesthesiology , Bronchoscopy/adverse effects , Bronchoscopy/standards , COVID-19 , Contraindications, Procedure , Coronary Care Units , Elective Surgical Procedures/standards , Emergencies , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Otolaryngology , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures , Pandemics , Postoperative Care/methods , Postoperative Care/standards , Respiration, Artificial/standards , Resuscitation , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain/epidemiology , Time Factors , Tracheostomy/adverse effects , Tracheostomy/methods
19.
Head Neck ; 42(7): 1657-1663, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-343070

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for ultrasonic devices use are imperative because infectious aerosols arising from airway procedures were a key etiologic factor in prior coronavirus outbreaks. This manuscript aims to summarize the available recommendations and the most relevant concepts about the use of ultrasonic scalpel during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. METHODS: Literature review of manuscripts with patients, animal models, or in vitro studies where the ultrasonic scalpel was used and the plume produced was analyzed in a quantitative and/ or qualitative way. DISCUSSION: Activated devices with tissue produce a biphasic bioaerosol composed (size 68.3-994 nm) of tissue particles, blood, intact and no viable cells, and carcinogenic or irritant hydrocarbons (benzene, ethylbenzene, styrene, toluene, heptene, and methylpropene). CONCLUSION: It is imperative to use an active smoke evacuator, to avoid ultrasonic scalpel use in COVID-19 positive patients and in upper airway surgery, as well as to follow the protection recommendations of the guidelines for management this type of patients.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Occupational/adverse effects , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Ultrasonic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , COVID-19 , Contraindications, Procedure , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Infection Control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Surgical Instruments
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL